Information on Result #503756

There is no (51, 95, 10254)-net in base 8, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 62 193018 847796 423470 656523 057746 054588 301265 304507 453454 174907 056112 465498 958609 823232 > 895

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (51, 96, 10254)-net in base 8 [i]m-Reduction