Information on Result #503762

There is no (63, 95, 223625)-net in base 8, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 62 169699 019278 760997 495684 334495 532695 540670 204126 366589 791680 817595 637108 560594 845176 > 895

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (63, 96, 223625)-net in base 8 [i]m-Reduction