Information on Result #503847

There is no (66, 98, 330259)-net in base 8, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 31829 478243 116488 008464 661463 298402 774000 080842 109964 765104 187244 633113 905166 722792 967929 > 898

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (66, 99, 330259)-net in base 8 [i]m-Reduction