Information on Result #504564

There is no (65, 121, 12882)-net in base 8, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 18 820794 796043 107383 766436 892187 738498 448837 694466 522656 623776 032795 145120 039853 382227 008805 896766 889387 671408 > 8121

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (65, 122, 12882)-net in base 8 [i]m-Reduction