Information on Result #504924
There is no (69, 131, 11601)-net in base 8, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 20178 665129 801666 031405 674296 694463 984387 547326 112061 221605 875701 814804 063806 290915 081667 268917 927107 584257 053510 724544 > 8131
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
Result | This result only | Method | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | No (69, 132, 11601)-net in base 8 | [i] | m-Reduction |