Information on Result #504924

There is no (69, 131, 11601)-net in base 8, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 20178 665129 801666 031405 674296 694463 984387 547326 112061 221605 875701 814804 063806 290915 081667 268917 927107 584257 053510 724544 > 8131

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (69, 132, 11601)-net in base 8 [i]m-Reduction