Information on Result #504952

There is no (52, 132, 2128)-net in base 8, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 164075 361732 479560 430939 557531 695689 251859 312776 344159 857532 991620 229506 332153 962842 457921 758332 680401 827790 158670 581466 > 8132

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (52, 133, 2128)-net in base 8 [i]m-Reduction