Information on Result #504984

There is no (41, 133, 1022)-net in base 8, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 1 331758 229374 953102 887280 718904 379042 669057 830439 292422 413919 132261 423787 069911 260249 712921 154406 091898 533063 993683 488920 > 8133

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (41, 134, 1022)-net in base 8 [i]m-Reduction