Information on Result #506105

There is no (52, 160, 1386)-net in base 8, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 3 126061 248544 741845 061234 550592 542151 599674 727700 363874 125925 851461 127038 991576 284849 559827 792091 936600 715594 186885 154660 031981 562528 844938 453744 > 8160

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (52, 161, 1386)-net in base 8 [i]m-Reduction