Information on Result #506107
There is no (56, 160, 1704)-net in base 8, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 3 196444 885622 264375 591460 639033 267563 439552 337736 400038 325515 525845 336864 733351 479258 842173 949789 624817 272976 791547 573781 713757 959250 063513 696504 > 8160
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (56, 161, 1704)-net in base 8 | [i] | m-Reduction | |