Information on Result #506110

There is no (62, 160, 2397)-net in base 8, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 3 175675 193650 592454 485846 661883 564638 931408 449285 468675 623805 619072 260626 748609 831680 377472 604515 883161 608686 342935 093867 371604 907917 008581 547176 > 8160

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (62, 161, 2397)-net in base 8 [i]m-Reduction