Information on Result #506111

There is no (64, 160, 2712)-net in base 8, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 3 162109 379819 034427 392605 788872 163947 531036 993819 547624 722587 144830 290244 037492 935071 485415 368842 502197 972805 773483 459326 043631 741250 442868 827716 > 8160

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (64, 161, 2712)-net in base 8 [i]m-Reduction