Information on Result #506157

There is no (67, 161, 3226)-net in base 8, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 25 165216 919600 968130 739317 561742 909386 579238 899651 501303 951624 449522 607855 577379 670129 027850 723831 757462 606440 177413 611850 347452 907552 426084 756064 > 8161

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (67, 162, 3226)-net in base 8 [i]m-Reduction