Information on Result #506275
There is no (28, 164, 521)-net in base 8, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 13168 109730 625848 946818 378710 971050 463162 709584 123653 918507 065023 804393 133542 456638 101641 569295 225882 667917 765440 802118 219970 306065 204362 154156 393168 > 8164
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (28, 165, 521)-net in base 8 | [i] | m-Reduction | |
| 2 | No (28, 166, 521)-net in base 8 | [i] | ||
| 3 | No (28, 167, 521)-net in base 8 | [i] | ||
| 4 | No (28, 168, 521)-net in base 8 | [i] | ||
| 5 | No (28, 169, 521)-net in base 8 | [i] | ||
| 6 | No (28, 170, 521)-net in base 8 | [i] | ||
| 7 | No (28, 171, 521)-net in base 8 | [i] | ||
| 8 | No (28, 172, 521)-net in base 8 | [i] | ||
| 9 | No (28, 173, 521)-net in base 8 | [i] | ||