Information on Result #506304

There is no (86, 164, 13778)-net in base 8, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 12813 336697 683798 256595 938975 319044 637009 499586 531132 177553 005628 510620 926512 646054 777627 877522 736097 020449 439572 513559 176176 975652 200756 518689 497040 > 8164

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (86, 165, 13778)-net in base 8 [i]m-Reduction