Information on Result #506325
There is no (35, 165, 662)-net in base 8, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 112162 075723 935618 425462 977973 864998 106155 739290 046006 230296 387545 552625 868482 021775 317966 381498 263612 936133 420694 034572 029052 061835 047909 493640 974786 > 8165
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (35, 166, 662)-net in base 8 | [i] | m-Reduction | |