Information on Result #506328
There is no (41, 165, 827)-net in base 8, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 104441 842305 457122 239739 411089 360145 153184 723597 879923 619028 750057 822154 773561 735734 809137 943040 935323 108366 528769 038342 668275 782614 770173 642160 968768 > 8165
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (41, 166, 827)-net in base 8 | [i] | m-Reduction | |