Information on Result #506340
There is no (65, 165, 2628)-net in base 8, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 102816 850123 985839 836094 069955 765842 155139 890934 030521 042918 234657 135336 802465 300884 706841 796987 068179 933225 475824 009429 284131 511940 428799 023147 479124 > 8165
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (65, 166, 2628)-net in base 8 | [i] | m-Reduction | |