Information on Result #506448
There is no (95, 167, 31526)-net in base 8, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 6 550830 632668 053662 468529 460672 669444 732431 811184 864199 119202 030480 234818 437188 091529 462905 168677 792022 897869 349666 222733 312711 341288 861557 972253 488045 > 8167
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (95, 168, 31526)-net in base 8 | [i] | m-Reduction | |