Information on Result #506505
There is no (116, 168, 1031666)-net in base 8, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 52 375061 464346 909224 413109 505020 890693 049067 743965 562960 412901 797291 992806 993780 380111 667812 024560 196575 020921 318718 728723 781652 321155 498577 108186 800240 > 8168
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
Result | This result only | Method | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | No (116, 169, 1031666)-net in base 8 | [i] | m-Reduction |