Information on Result #506509

There is no (29, 169, 539)-net in base 8, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 446 068517 783683 744960 653949 732492 849936 562899 959994 691262 219201 043561 385595 324958 503800 782877 511923 541478 264758 534749 759489 136660 647681 530611 800480 688144 > 8169

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (29, 170, 539)-net in base 8 [i]m-Reduction