Information on Result #506540
There is no (91, 169, 17994)-net in base 8, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 419 104908 165920 037243 421160 243655 766297 378020 445931 282669 340870 280540 026962 830904 643158 091410 729315 883246 396956 883877 820756 985515 380587 454618 823236 782696 > 8169
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
Result | This result only | Method | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | No (91, 170, 17994)-net in base 8 | [i] | m-Reduction |