Information on Result #506558

There is no (32, 170, 594)-net in base 8, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 3653 141757 338348 271900 202678 757879 794740 074983 562767 515081 042552 107507 558405 643541 914662 082823 021929 430021 475088 508875 982657 430553 331755 207865 322506 902820 > 8170

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (32, 171, 594)-net in base 8 [i]m-Reduction