Information on Result #506637

There is no (93, 171, 20022)-net in base 8, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 26840 762244 716996 435859 649025 143628 699733 200354 577829 244218 639978 553746 012997 342517 130226 818211 219698 324986 617034 131827 966510 409635 673982 437923 214379 292536 > 8171

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (93, 172, 20022)-net in base 8 [i]m-Reduction