Information on Result #506927

There is no (10, 34, 328)-net in base 9, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 286 139619 195985 204002 496345 455873 > 934

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (10, 35, 328)-net in base 9 [i]m-Reduction