Information on Result #507055
There is no (11, 45, 292)-net in base 9, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 9 165304 925077 758797 149258 948905 993584 938785 > 945
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (11, 46, 292)-net in base 9 | [i] | m-Reduction | |