Information on Result #507165

There is no (32, 52, 51868)-net in base 9, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 41 745846 016463 768539 522999 480181 988108 745496 074305 > 952

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (32, 53, 51868)-net in base 9 [i]m-Reduction