Information on Result #507305

There is no (21, 61, 833)-net in base 9, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 16303 649936 301505 613354 078035 903875 102526 054229 421664 075809 > 961

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (21, 62, 833)-net in base 9 [i]m-Reduction