Information on Result #507305
There is no (21, 61, 833)-net in base 9, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 16303 649936 301505 613354 078035 903875 102526 054229 421664 075809 > 961
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
Result | This result only | Method | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | No (21, 62, 833)-net in base 9 | [i] | m-Reduction |