Information on Result #507363

There is no (30, 64, 3500)-net in base 9, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 11 801209 929110 349617 730512 519406 269530 651140 653703 000814 632801 > 964

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (30, 65, 3500)-net in base 9 [i]m-Reduction