Information on Result #507858

There is no (33, 87, 1606)-net in base 9, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 104755 501196 370761 197425 147233 163692 249917 606574 850774 730928 342160 623854 271545 394641 > 987

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (33, 88, 1606)-net in base 9 [i]m-Reduction