Information on Result #507883

There is no (32, 88, 1393)-net in base 9, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 954974 387588 584331 158643 627075 214465 297213 605366 238867 704049 567420 549898 873276 951905 > 988

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (32, 89, 1393)-net in base 9 [i]m-Reduction