Information on Result #507884

There is no (34, 88, 1744)-net in base 9, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 949481 673611 546593 475882 340382 122299 565998 410722 831942 762831 754066 369906 065547 617665 > 988

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (34, 89, 1744)-net in base 9 [i]m-Reduction