Information on Result #507885

There is no (36, 88, 2223)-net in base 9, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 943409 683367 386724 761245 853719 291764 248239 354804 745596 706592 332733 661528 393691 283505 > 988

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (36, 89, 2223)-net in base 9 [i]m-Reduction