Information on Result #507903

There is no (21, 89, 512)-net in base 9, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 8 514899 868098 919737 188437 403260 021915 820538 327097 196753 215976 600927 581822 321924 399105 > 989

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (21, 90, 512)-net in base 9 [i]m-Reduction