Information on Result #507988
There is no (36, 92, 1912)-net in base 9, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 6185 884625 282819 880116 609429 185525 404083 076215 649233 546399 047892 701140 328297 821037 141761 > 992
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
Result | This result only | Method | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | No (36, 93, 1912)-net in base 9 | [i] | m-Reduction |