Information on Result #507988

There is no (36, 92, 1912)-net in base 9, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 6185 884625 282819 880116 609429 185525 404083 076215 649233 546399 047892 701140 328297 821037 141761 > 992

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (36, 93, 1912)-net in base 9 [i]m-Reduction