Information on Result #508092

There is no (28, 96, 817)-net in base 9, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 41 508649 473106 782778 841072 442732 409655 582552 410392 905842 551019 552036 046270 306580 539240 538705 > 996

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (28, 97, 817)-net in base 9 [i]m-Reduction