Information on Result #508110
There is no (64, 96, 451747)-net in base 9, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 40 484684 359169 995000 256259 543777 107958 219327 726790 373486 890050 614264 929149 491213 784779 236737 > 996
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
Result | This result only | Method | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | No (64, 97, 451747)-net in base 9 | [i] | m-Reduction |