Information on Result #508110

There is no (64, 96, 451747)-net in base 9, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 40 484684 359169 995000 256259 543777 107958 219327 726790 373486 890050 614264 929149 491213 784779 236737 > 996

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (64, 97, 451747)-net in base 9 [i]m-Reduction