Information on Result #508171

There is no (21, 99, 486)-net in base 9, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 30994 263077 086785 390613 870114 937799 626651 769670 997948 219068 457279 073280 413478 025476 793071 431313 > 999

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (21, 100, 486)-net in base 9 [i]m-Reduction