Information on Result #508176

There is no (31, 99, 996)-net in base 9, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 30086 874252 546190 890996 225125 186684 275701 011636 888126 834684 817846 681086 432865 114488 422735 689921 > 999

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (31, 100, 996)-net in base 9 [i]m-Reduction