Information on Result #508205

There is no (32, 100, 1064)-net in base 9, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 271970 103994 237113 994166 935134 176117 639732 740284 260494 297182 786150 697630 611501 619619 738002 204545 > 9100

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (32, 101, 1064)-net in base 9 [i]m-Reduction