Information on Result #508205
There is no (32, 100, 1064)-net in base 9, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 271970 103994 237113 994166 935134 176117 639732 740284 260494 297182 786150 697630 611501 619619 738002 204545 > 9100
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
Result | This result only | Method | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | No (32, 101, 1064)-net in base 9 | [i] | m-Reduction |