Information on Result #508232

There is no (29, 101, 828)-net in base 9, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 2 493051 737814 129422 585170 553117 917830 818780 876717 408505 383422 870440 204366 647717 138697 389905 622145 > 9101

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (29, 102, 828)-net in base 9 [i]m-Reduction