Information on Result #508262

There is no (32, 102, 1029)-net in base 9, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 21 833791 331637 342635 085484 445592 809657 787040 693369 157884 715259 510524 740081 813233 344160 472528 732857 > 9102

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (32, 103, 1029)-net in base 9 [i]m-Reduction