Information on Result #508267

There is no (42, 102, 2625)-net in base 9, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 21 527982 589802 621251 721771 716784 780908 032196 119615 864317 128049 182200 821848 160360 107190 335629 662641 > 9102

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (42, 103, 2625)-net in base 9 [i]m-Reduction