Information on Result #508318

There is no (26, 104, 651)-net in base 9, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 1755 847860 501948 554619 478760 718125 949969 003337 232313 026985 174585 705916 838603 940527 412453 473045 442537 > 9104

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (26, 105, 651)-net in base 9 [i]m-Reduction