Information on Result #508377

There is no (26, 106, 642)-net in base 9, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 143601 976251 340489 448540 600570 354874 327172 660202 298413 876891 695560 226631 367542 146309 036710 804936 739713 > 9106

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (26, 107, 642)-net in base 9 [i]m-Reduction