Information on Result #508564
There is no (32, 112, 902)-net in base 9, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 76249 896818 897479 804388 288704 602732 923118 113683 043909 435444 262619 319759 482340 701057 002141 278100 201829 000833 > 9112
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (32, 113, 902)-net in base 9 | [i] | m-Reduction | |