Information on Result #508707
There is no (62, 116, 17164)-net in base 9, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 492 407826 646805 310722 415541 514522 388056 392407 878997 468670 278812 259054 833277 614576 439960 522681 672069 409599 932065 > 9116
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
Result | This result only | Method | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | No (62, 117, 17164)-net in base 9 | [i] | m-Reduction |