Information on Result #508818
There is no (20, 120, 445)-net in base 9, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 3 269332 578566 845889 341263 307566 913317 056206 186358 792073 947872 396474 671369 845105 659665 832926 589065 085608 692945 737233 > 9120
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (20, 121, 445)-net in base 9 | [i] | m-Reduction | |
| 2 | No (20, 122, 445)-net in base 9 | [i] | ||
| 3 | No (20, 123, 445)-net in base 9 | [i] | ||
| 4 | No (20, 124, 445)-net in base 9 | [i] | ||