Information on Result #508935
There is no (51, 123, 3229)-net in base 9, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 2361 048847 628617 057196 284508 595032 833719 020694 562952 326481 952048 238711 031945 663906 285645 960715 670521 376789 125304 428833 > 9123
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (51, 124, 3229)-net in base 9 | [i] | m-Reduction | |