Information on Result #508976
There is no (64, 124, 13223)-net in base 9, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 21227 642665 066863 373120 839433 235056 150085 603363 185614 491771 816163 145689 484794 337349 850932 107788 756615 199594 450366 723473 > 9124
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (64, 125, 13223)-net in base 9 | [i] | m-Reduction | |