Information on Result #508996

There is no (33, 125, 854)-net in base 9, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 196273 574039 822497 145199 701554 312574 719812 090339 754467 118963 074699 799728 244509 095371 935968 568625 464538 902865 573610 191713 > 9125

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (33, 126, 854)-net in base 9 [i]m-Reduction